For informational purposes only — not investment advice
This analyzer applies a heuristic interpretation of William O'Neil's CAN SLIM framework to public market data. Scores are NOT investment recommendations and have NOT been validated by forward backtesting. The composite weights are author-chosen, the universe is limited to ~70 semiconductor stocks, and several signals (sector RS, US 13F, KR short-interest) have known data gaps. You are responsible for your own investment decisions. Securities investment carries the risk of total principal loss.
Note:Japan-listed stocks: Financial data is based on annual fiscal-year reports (quarterly breakdown unavailable). PER and ROE use trailing 12-month figures. Growth metrics (EPS YoY, CAN SLIM C) compare fiscal years, not quarters — recent intra-year momentum may not be reflected.
CAN SLIM — William O'Neil 7-factor breakdown
O'Neil's CAN SLIM framework was extracted from a study of the biggest stock-market winners over 100 years. Each letter is a non-negotiable trait the winners shared. We score each one against our data:
30
-15.47%
RSI(14)40.1
ADX(14)14.0
Our reading
EPS YoY 48.7%
EPS YoY+48.7%
EPS QoQ—
Accel—
Latest EPS97.74
Independent Corroboration — Multi-factor View
Same stock, multiple independent frameworks. Piotroski F-Score (financial strength), classical quant metrics, factor grades (5 dimensions), and quality indicators — when they agree, conviction is highest.
Auto-computed heuristic scores from public data. Not a buy / sell recommendation. Consensus target price, institutional flow, and short-interest data are not yet integrated.
G3
OCF > Net Income (earnings quality)
insufficient data
—
G4ROA stable or consistently improvinginsufficient data—
G5Revenue growth stable or all-positiveinsufficient data—
G6R&D/Assets > industry medianinsufficient data—
G7CapEx/Assets > industry medianinsufficient data—
✓Consistent positive operating cash flow4 of 4 recent quarters positive
✓Trading above 200-day MAPrice 9822.00 vs EMA200 8114.58
These are objective threshold checks, not analyst judgment. A "moat-like profile" is NOT a Morningstar moat rating — it indicates the stock crosses our thresholds, nothing more.