For informational purposes only — not investment advice
This analyzer applies a heuristic interpretation of William O'Neil's CAN SLIM framework to public market data. Scores are NOT investment recommendations and have NOT been validated by forward backtesting. The composite weights are author-chosen, the universe is limited to ~70 semiconductor stocks, and several signals (sector RS, US 13F, KR short-interest) have known data gaps. You are responsible for your own investment decisions. Securities investment carries the risk of total principal loss.
Note:Japan-listed stocks: Financial data is based on annual fiscal-year reports (quarterly breakdown unavailable). PER and ROE use trailing 12-month figures. Growth metrics (EPS YoY, CAN SLIM C) compare fiscal years, not quarters — recent intra-year momentum may not be reflected.
CAN SLIM — William O'Neil 7-factor breakdown
O'Neil's CAN SLIM framework was extracted from a study of the biggest stock-market winners over 100 years. Each letter is a non-negotiable trait the winners shared. We score each one against our data:
+10
Near EMA50 (low extension)+1.3%+12
RSI in sweet spot43.2+8
NR7 — coilingYES+7
High volatility8.8%-6
-33.88%
RSI(14)43.2
ADX(14)21.2
Our reading
EPS YoY 95.8% · accel 304.80
EPS YoY+95.8%
EPS QoQ—
Accel+304.80 ↗
Latest EPS1009.15
Independent Corroboration — Multi-factor View
Same stock, multiple independent frameworks. Piotroski F-Score (financial strength), classical quant metrics, factor grades (5 dimensions), and quality indicators — when they agree, conviction is highest.
Auto-computed heuristic scores from public data. Not a buy / sell recommendation. Consensus target price, institutional flow, and short-interest data are not yet integrated.
G3
OCF > Net Income (earnings quality)
insufficient data
—
G4ROA stable or consistently improvingVar 2.88 vs median 14.23✓
G5Revenue growth stable or all-positiveinsufficient data—
G6R&D/Assets > industry medianinsufficient data—
G7CapEx/Assets > industry medianCapEx/A 26.0% vs median 11.9%✓
G8SG&A/Assets > industry medianinsufficient data—
⚠ 5 of 8 checks couldn't be computed
90%
Total debt / equity
Market Cap
JPY39.25T
Price × shares outstanding
Revenue Growth (YoY)
+37.0%
vs. year-ago quarter
PSR
—
Market Cap / TTM Revenue
EV/EBITDA
—
Enterprise Value / Op. Income (proxy)
Current Ratio
1.47
Current Assets / Current Liabilities
FCF Yield
2.8%
(OCF - Capex) / Market Cap
BPS
JPY2.56K
Book Value Per Share
ROIC
—
Return on Invested Capital
Inv. Turnover
—
COGS / Inventory (higher = more efficient)
CapEx Intensity
—
|CapEx| / Revenue (overinvestment vs contraction)
Sector comparison · Memory (5 peers)
PER: 31.0x vs median 20.2x(premium)
PBR: 28.06x vs median 8.96x(premium)
⚠ Tone bands are generic. Semiconductors often run higher PER/PBR than the cross-sector average.
2025-11-13X
Surprise: -19.7%
Actual: 75.36 / Est: 93.83
2025-08-08O
Surprise: +112.4%
Actual: 33.90 / Est: 15.96
Avg. surprise (last 4): +23.7%
NY Stocks Fall on Korean Semiconductor Shock; Micron Down 4%
2026-07-07· Investing.com 한국어— Contagion selloff from Korea chip shock
✓Consistent positive operating cash flow5 of 5 recent quarters positive
✓Trading above 200-day MAPrice 71870.00 vs EMA200 37098.59
These are objective threshold checks, not analyst judgment. A "moat-like profile" is NOT a Morningstar moat rating — it indicates the stock crosses our thresholds, nothing more.